Rethinking the Semantics of Complex Nominals

نویسندگان

  • Nabil Abdullah
  • Richard A. Frost
چکیده

Complex Nominals (CNs) have simple syntactic structure that conceals non-trivial semantic characteristics. While speakers of natural languages combine noun(s)/adjective(s) with a head noun to indicate existing or novel concepts with ease, formalizing such a semantic process, however, has proven to be a daunting task. In this paper, we present a unified semantic approach for constructions involving a head-noun and modifier(s), i.e., adjective(s)/noun(s). Based on a rigorous typing system, this approach uses set intersection as the only underlying semantic rule. We argue that this novel approach is compositional and warrants consistent inferences.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

The Semantics of Proper Names and Other Bare Nominals

Title of dissertation: THE SEMANTICS OF PROPER NAMES AND OTHER BARE NOMINALS Yu Izumi, Doctor of Philosophy, 2012 Dissertation directed by: Professor Paul M Pietroski Department of Philosophy This research proposes a unified approach to the semantics of the so-called bare nominals, which include proper names (e.g., Mary), mass and plural terms (e.g., water, cats), and articleless noun phrases i...

متن کامل

No ordered arguments needed for nouns ∗ Scott Grimm and Louise McNally

Syntacticians have widely assumed since [11] that there is a fundamental difference between so-called argument structure nominals (AS-nominals, also called Complex Event Nominals), e.g. destruction, and non-AS-nominals, e.g. book ([1, 5], i.a.). Grimshaw provided a list of properties characterizing AS-nominals, most notably that they have obligatory arguments (e.g. the destruction *(of Carthage...

متن کامل

Understanding deverbal nominals: World knowledge or lexical semantics?

The paper investigates how speakers understand constructions with deverbal nominals, i.e. nominals such as destruction that are morphologically related to verbs. Specifically, given the expression the enemy’s destruction, how do the speakers decide whether the possessive argument is the entity that initiates the action (agent) or the entity that is causally affected by the event (patient)? The ...

متن کامل

Inference in Probabilistic Ontologies with Attributive Concept Descriptions and Nominals

This paper proposes a probabilistic description logic that combines (i) constructs of the well-known ALC logic, (ii) probabilistic assertions, and (iii) limited use of nominals. We start with our recently proposed logic crALC, where any ontology can be translated into a relational Bayesian network with partially specified probabilities. We then add nominals to restrictions, while keeping crALC’...

متن کامل

Deverbal Semantics and the Montagovian Generative Lexicon $$\Lambda \!\mathsf {Ty}_n$$ Λ Ty n

We propose a lexical account of action nominals, in particular of deverbal nom-inalisations, whose meaning is related to the event expressed by their base verb. The literature about nominalisations often assumes that the semantics of the base verb completely defines the structure of action nominals. We argue that the information in the base verb is not sufficient to completely determine the sem...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2007